
Prevention of incorrect benefits is the responsibility of every staff member and client. Incorrect coverage includes both understated and overstated eligibility.
Understated eligibility occurs when the client does not receive the level or extent of coverage they were entitled to receive. Eligibility staff shall document how the understated eligibility was determined and the reason correction was required. All understated eligibility must be promptly resolved.
Understatement of eligibility shall be corrected promptly using the program policies in effect for the month(s) in which the error occurred.
The following are situations in which a correction of understated eligibility is required.
A recipient may also be entitled to correction of understated eligibility where a change has been reported and verified timely, but the future month has already been authorized due to system cutoff date.
There may be instances where the medical provider is outside of the timely billing time frame to receive payment for services and the client has already privately paid the bill. The provider may be unwilling to reimburse the client since they will not be able to receive payment from the state. In those instances, the client shall be reimbursed by the state for the verified amounts paid to the provider, up to the allowed rate for the service. There is no other provision for correcting the understated eligibility.
Even though a technical understatement of eligibility may have occurred, an eligibility correction is not required in the following situations:
Once it has been determined that an understated eligibility has occurred, the amount of the underpayment, if any, shall be calculated and the case corrected as soon as possible but no later than 20 calendar days after the worker identifies that a correction is necessary.
The month the discontinuance initially occurred shall be the first month coverage was not received as a result of the erroneous discontinuance.
Overstated eligibility occurs when an individual receives more coverage than they are entitled to receive. Eligibility staff shall document how the overstated eligibility was determined and the reason case correction was required. All overstated eligibility must be promptly resolved.
There are three types of claims. The type of claim will determine action to be taken in recovery efforts.
Instances of agency error which may result in a claim include, but are not limited to, the following:
Instances of client error which may result in a claim include, but are not limited to, the following:
A fraudulent error occurs when the client intentionally:
An individual shall be considered to have committed fraud when the individual has been legally determined to have committed fraud through a court of appropriate jurisdiction. There is no other method of establishing a fraud claim.
A finding of fraud under these provisions may result in criminal penalty, including fines and imprisonment, but may only result in a period of ineligibility if so, ordered by the court. Fraud error status is not established if the court’s resolution to the willful client error is to place the individual on diversion.
Even though a technical overstatement of eligibility may have occurred, a claim shall not be established in the following instances.
The date of discovery for purposes of tracking timely claims shall be the date the case is first identified as potentially having overstated eligibility by the worker, quality assurance, or by other means.
NOTE: Failure to establish a claim within the time frames identified above does not negate the responsibility of the agency to establish or collect on the claim, or of the client to repay any valid overstated eligibility.
In calculating the amount of the claim, the agency shall determine the point at which the correct information should have been reported and acted upon timely allowing for timely notice as appropriate. From that point, the correct coverage (if any) shall be determined. The corrected coverage shall then be compared against the actual coverage received to determine the difference. The difference in the coverage received versus the coverage entitled to receive is the amount of the claim.
The actual amount of the claim shall be:
NOTE: For ineligibility due to excess resources, the amount of the claim cannot exceed the amount by which countable resources exceeded the allowable resource limit. If the value of the resources varies during the months of ineligibility, the highest value obtained shall be used.
Once the amount of the overstated eligibility has been determined, a claim in that amount shall be established. The type of the claim - Agency Error, Client Error, or Fraud Error, shall determine which action to take next.
A suspected fraud error shall be referred to the Office of the Medicaid Inspector General (OMIG). The OMIG will decide whether to pursue the case in court. If a decision is made not to pursue, the claim will be labeled as Client Error and processed as such. If the claim is accepted by the OMIG for prosecution, no further action shall be taken until a decision by the court has been rendered.
Individuals should not receive notice that the case is under investigation for fraud. Client inquiries concerning the possible fraud investigation should be responded with a statement that the case is “under administrative review.” No additional information should be provided.
Collection action for an Agency Error or Client Error claim shall be initiated by sending the household a repayment agreement. No action shall be taken on a Fraud Error claim until the court has rendered a decision.
The repayment agreement shall include the amount of the claim and the reason the overstated eligibility has occurred. The household is given 10-days to respond to the repayment agreement.
Once the household has been notified of the overstatement of eligibility and repayment requested, collection action shall be initiated. Recovery may only be initiated if there are countable resources that are currently available. This includes any resources counted toward the allowable resource limit outlined in 5130.
Agency Error and Client Error claims shall be collected in one of the following ways:
Medical expenses may be allowed against the special spenddown if the expense is verified, medically necessary and reported to the agency on at least a 6- month basis. Medical expenses shall be counted against the regular spenddown (if any) and then the special spenddown.
A special spenddown may be used for both automatic and determined eligible. There is no requirement that the client have a regular spenddown. However, a special spenddown shall not be used in the Medicaid poverty level or CHIP programs.
If a special spenddown is imposed on a regular spenddown, the amount of both spenddowns must be met before the overstated eligibility claim is considered satisfied. If unmet, the special spenddown may extend over more than one base period.
A claim that has been determined to be fraudulent through a court of appropriate jurisdiction shall be collected in the same manner as other types of claims. A repayment agreement shall be sent to the household as indicated in 11125.
If the agency becomes aware of any bankruptcy proceedings concerning a household with an uncollected medical assistance claim, KDHE-DHCF Legal Division shall be notified immediately. Legal division will provide instruction on how to proceed. Legal division will provide notification when the bankruptcy action is complete. Collection action should then be initiated, resumed or terminated (see 11127) in accordance with the outcome of the final bankruptcy action.
An uncollected claim shall be terminated when either of the following occur:
Reserved
The amount of the claim determined by the agency may be reduced in accordance with a court order. The amount determined to be uncollectable shall be the compromised amount of the claim. The original amount of the claim minus the compromised amount shall be the amount then subject to collection.